The Indiana Law Review is pleased to announce the following members have been selected for its Volume 52 Editorial Board. We look forward to their leadership and contributions to legal scholarship throughout the 2018-19 academic year. Congratulations!

J. Mitchell Tanner, Editor-in-Chief
Nicole Dobias, Executive Managing Editor
Riley Parr, Executive Notes Editor
Carla Uhlarik, Senior Executive Editor
Courtney Abshire, Executive Articles Editor
Amelia Marvel, Executive Articles Editor
Sarah Correll, Symposium Editor
Henry Robison, Executive Online Editor

Note Development Editors:
Thomas Buchanan
Amy Burbrink
Christopher Frank
Elizabeth Hyde

Articles Editors:
Michael Daniells
Alyssa Devine
Charles Richert
E. Ryan Shouse

(Implicit) Consent to Intimacy

There is convincing evidence that persons in nursing homes, even persons with dementia in its later stages, benefit physically, mentally, and emotionally from close contact with loved ones, including conversation, touch, hugs and embraces, kissing, and sex. Nevertheless, nursing homes often discourage ongoing intimate relationships because of logistical, financial, and other considerations.

First Do No Harm: The Manipulation of Public Health for Non-Public Health Purposes and its Legal Consequences

At its core, public health is concerned with promoting and protecting the health of populations. However, public health has often times been used to subvert the very same goals it is designed to achieve.

Teaching Social Justice in Law Schools: Whose Morality is It?

I pondered the question that their faculty at the law school had already answered—what role should the personal ethics and morality of a law professor play in teaching?

In Defense of Secondary Pharmaceutical Patents: A Response to the UN’s Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Patent Examination

[T]he Guidelines’ assumption that many types of pharmaceutical inventions are inherently obvious and undeserving of patent protection is incorrect and based on an oversimplified view of how these inventions come about. This Article provides an evidence-based response to the Guidelines that refutes, or at least qualifies, some of the significant conclusions and recommendations set forth by its author.

A New Twist On Remedies: Judicial Assignment of Bad Faith Contracts

Questions abound, but judicial assignment of a bad faith claim may provide a remedy to the injured third party when the tortfeasor is unwilling or unable to assign his or her rights and claims against an insurer.