Any new practice involving communication can pose a challenge to established free speech law. A few such practices are of exceptional value in promoting a clearer understanding of free speech law and, crucially, of the increasingly important deficiencies of even our best free speech theories. The practice of projecting light messages onto targeted property is just such a practice.
The Indiana Law Review is pleased to announce the following members have been selected for its Volume 52 Editorial Board. We look forward to their leadership and contributions to legal scholarship throughout the 2018-19 academic year. Congratulations!
J. Mitchell Tanner, Editor-in-Chief
Nicole Dobias, Executive Managing Editor
Riley Parr, Executive Notes Editor
Carla Uhlarik, Senior Executive Editor
Courtney Abshire, Executive Articles Editor
Amelia Marvel, Executive Articles Editor
Sarah Correll, Symposium Editor
Henry Robison, Executive Online Editor
Note Development Editors:
E. Ryan Shouse
by Allan Griffey, 2L Note Candidate What has the reputation of being fair, competent, and independent? The federal […]
Jennifer Phillips, 2L Note Candidate Stalemate. Gridlock. Government shutdown. Words like this are starting to seem like the […]
by Tess Anglin, 2L Note Candidate Michael DeBoer’s article Justice Brent E. Dickson, State Constitutional Interpretation, and the […]